Closer to Certainty for Minimum Taxation of Trusts: Treasury Releases Draft Legislation
After announcing the intended introduction of a minimum 30% tax on discretionary trusts as part of the 2026/27 Federal Budget […]
Acis Legal, current as of: 18 September 2025.
As wealth moves from one generation to the next, trust deeds often sit at the heart of a family’s financial structure. However, more frequently than many appreciate, defects buried in deed documentation or in chains of amendments can undermine intentions, create unintended tax consequences, or even block transfers of control that were originally intended.
This article highlights where the risks tend to arise, what to look out for and how advisers can help their clients avoid weak links in their client’s trust structures when planning for the future.
Over time, trust deeds are rarely static with amendments often being made to the trustee and appointor positions, key provisions such as those relating to income and streaming, trustee powers and foreign person exclusions to avoid foreign person surcharge duty when holding real property in an Australian state/territory.
Commonly with SMSFs, if amendments are not aligned with the original deed or past changes are missing, the chain of deeds will contain gaps. This creates uncertainty about the rules of the Fund and may cast doubt on the validity of trustee decisions made after the gap. Such issues may ultimately result in issues such as SIS breaches, non-compliance and even unintended outcomes when it comes to death benefit recipients and associated tax implications.
Even if deeds are well intentioned, they can be voided or have their validity challenged due to technical requirements not being met. Common issues that arise include:
For example, consider the following scenario:
This illustrates how even small deviations from the original deeds terms can undermine later trustee actions.
Commonly, deeds will have clerical issues such as:
When trustees step down, appointors change, or beneficiaries shift across generations, the trust deed becomes the framework that ensures wealth passes as intended. Defects in that framework can derail succession plans, disrupt asset protection strategies, and cause disputes within families; precisely at the time when stability and certainty are most important.
Consequences may be as serious as the ultimate control of the trust lying with unintended persons, beneficiary entitlements not aligning with the intentions of the family group, legal challenges or adverse tax implications.
Advisers should ensure any trust deed amendments are valid and enforceable, reducing the risk of disputes, unintended transfers of control, or adverse tax outcomes. Best practice includes checking the entire chain of deeds, verifying the execution of deeds and checking consistency across all amendments.
At Acis, our legal team incorporates this checking process into every trust or SMSF amendment order. By identifying and raising issues early, we help advisers make informed decisions about rectification, saving time, cost, and reputational risk while ensuring transactions such as loan applications or restructures proceed without unnecessary delays.
Contact us to learn more about how we check the chain of trust deeds for every deed of amendment order we receive, to ensure that wherever possible, any historical issues in the chain of trust deeds are identified and rectified.
After announcing the intended introduction of a minimum 30% tax on discretionary trusts as part of the 2026/27 Federal Budget […]
Share buybacks, capital reductions and financial assistance transactions can trigger complex Corporations Act requirements, with non-compliance often leading to ASIC requisitions or issues with lenders. Join this practical session to understand the key rules, common pitfalls, and critical considerations when navigating these transactions. […]
From 1 July 2027, the proposed CGT rules introduce a deemed disposal mechanism, four new categories of capital gains, a new seven-step method statement, and the return of indexation in certain circumstances. They also interact with proposed changes relating to negative gearing. Understanding how these rules interact will be critical when advising your clients with existing assets. […]