Staying on the Right Side of SMSF Compliance
The ATO’s increased focus on market valuations, asset titles, contributions, and other key areas makes it essential to stay up to date with the latest regulatory requirements. […]
Emily Pritchard, current as of: 21 March 2019.
The Acis Legal Services team is seeing a significant increase in documents that are incorrectly executed, leading to unnecessary costs, delays and inconvenience for end clients. We recently conducted a review of trust deeds held by a large regional firm and found issues in at least 25% of them requiring some remedial action.
Signing legal documents can be technical and difficult to comprehend, so it’s no surprise that mistakes are made. We’ve provided some guidance below on the issues we’re coming across; however, be warned, this is not an exhaustive summary of all potential defects.
For any document to be legally binding and enforceable, it must be signed by each of the parties to it. While that may sound self-evident, it’s not just a case of putting a signature on the correct page. It’s critical that documents are executed correctly to ensure they take effect as intended.
In the world of Acis, our primary concern is with deeds as they are used most commonly to establish trusts, including super funds. For a document to be a deed it must:
Failing to complete each of these steps can lead to a document not taking effect as a deed, and consequently not achieving its desired outcome. While we don’t need to explain the first two points, it’s worth detailing what we mean by “sealed and delivered”:
The one time these rules don’t apply is where a company executes a deed – the Corporations Act 2001 states that a company is taken to have executed a deed where it is signed by two directors, a director and a secretary or a sole director who is also the sole secretary.
In most States and Territories, the proper execution of deeds also requires that an independent witness attests the signing by each signatory. Again, this does not apply to companies.
We’ve seen numerous instances of defective execution of deeds where:
Don’t wait for someone else (like a bank or other third party) to identify a problem while a pending settlement is fast approaching.
At Acis, we always review the execution of deeds to ensure questions relating to validity should not arise in the future. If, in our view, execution could be called into question, we raise it with our clients, giving them the option to ratify a defective execution while we are undertaking the work for which we originally received instructions.
As we’ve always said, non-lawyers should never prepare deeds of amendment – especially if they use a robotic supplier – as there is no proper legal review to identify the sorts of issues we’ve outlined. As such, any future amendment or action could be invalid if the formalities of signing are not followed. This is an issue we’ve raised previously.
We also caution readers about the electronic signature of deeds, particularly by companies. See our previous Acis All Areas here.
The main takeout is to take the time at the outset to ensure deeds supplied to, and signed by your clients are correctly executed.
And remember that the Acis power of attorney service for the settlement of trusts removes risks associated with execution as we fully execute the documents here. More details on this service are available here.
As always, don’t hesitate to get in touch with our Legal Services team for any deed reviews. Better to play it safe and double check the execution.
The ATO’s increased focus on market valuations, asset titles, contributions, and other key areas makes it essential to stay up to date with the latest regulatory requirements. […]
In this webinar Peter Johnson covered the five key pillars of ethics outlined in APES 110 and explained the CPD requirements for various professional bodies. He also discussed the latest pronouncements from the Standards Board, helping attendees understand the updates and their implications. […]
ASIC data reveals more individuals are choosing DIY company registrations, bypassing advisors and saving on costs. However, this cheaper route provides only a certificate of registration, missing crucial legal documents. This oversight can lead to serious legal and financial risks for both the company and its officers. In this article, we’ll explore these potential pitfalls, equipping you with the insights needed to navigate and mitigate issues when clients come to you for support. […]