Closer to Certainty for Minimum Taxation of Trusts: Treasury Releases Draft Legislation
After announcing the intended introduction of a minimum 30% tax on discretionary trusts as part of the 2026/27 Federal Budget […]
James Creevy and Mitchell Harding, current as of: 19 June 2026.
When establishing a trust in Australia, one of the key structural decisions is whether to appoint an individual trustee or a corporate trustee. While latter will come with higher initial setup costs, the use of a corporate trustee is widely regarded as best practice in many circumstances. This article outlines the key advantages of adopting a corporate trustee structure and why it is often preferred by advisors and clients alike.
A corporate trustee provides a layer of legal separation between the trust’s obligations and the individuals involved. Due to a company being a separate legal entity, liability is generally limited to the assets of the company itself.
In contrast, individual trustees can be personally liable for the debts and obligations of the trust. While they may have a right of indemnity against trust assets, this protection is not always sufficient. This is particularly relevant where the trust assets are inadequate to cover a liability or the indemnity is impaired.
One of the most significant advantages of a corporate trustee is continuity. A company continues indefinitely regardless of changes in directors or shareholders.
With individual trustees, any change – such as death, incapacity, or resignation – can trigger administrative burdens, including:
A corporate trustee avoids these disruptions as the legal owner of the trust assets, being the company, remains unchanged even where the directors or shareholders of the corporate trustee change.
Because the company remains the legal owner of trust assets, there is no need to transfer asset ownership when directors change. This results in:
This is particularly valuable for trusts holding real property or other registrable assets, where changes in ownership can be time-consuming and costly.
In the case of SMSFs, director penalties are imposed on a trustee basis, so where an SMSF has individual trustees, the ATO will impose any penalty on each individual trustee, meaning the penalty will be multiplied by the number of trustees. Corporate trustees, however, will incur only 1 penalty.
Additionally, in single-member funds, it is possible to have a single-director company act as trustee – this avoids the need to appoint a second non-member trustee as would be the case in the event of individual trustees.
Using a corporate trustee can make it clearer to third parties that the entity is acting in its capacity as trustee. Contracts, loan agreements, and other documents can explicitly refer to the company “as trustee for” the relevant trust.
This clarity can:
A corporate trustee can simplify succession planning. Control of the trust can effectively be transferred by changing the directors or shareholders of the trustee company, rather than appointing new trustees.
This allows for:
In many cases, a corporate trustee presents a more professional image, particularly where the trust is engaged in business or investment activities. Lenders, investors, and counterparties often view a corporate trustee structure as more robust and reliable.
Ultimately, the use of a corporate trustee provides a more robust and future-proof foundation for the administration of a trust. By enhancing asset protection, ensuring continuity, and reducing administrative complexity, it allows trustees and beneficiaries to focus on the effective management and growth of trust assets with greater confidence. While each structure should be considered in light of the specific circumstances, a corporate trustee is, in most cases, a prudent choice that supports both operational efficiency and long-term strategic outcomes.
| Acis does not provide advice in relation to commercial law, taxation, duty, company law or any other matter. We do not purport to provide advice nor should you construe anything in any correspondence with us, or material provided by us, as advice of any kind. |
After announcing the intended introduction of a minimum 30% tax on discretionary trusts as part of the 2026/27 Federal Budget […]
Share buybacks, capital reductions and financial assistance transactions can trigger complex Corporations Act requirements, with non-compliance often leading to ASIC requisitions or issues with lenders. Join this practical session to understand the key rules, common pitfalls, and critical considerations when navigating these transactions. […]
From 1 July 2027, the proposed CGT rules introduce a deemed disposal mechanism, four new categories of capital gains, a new seven-step method statement, and the return of indexation in certain circumstances. They also interact with proposed changes relating to negative gearing. Understanding how these rules interact will be critical when advising your clients with existing assets. […]